The Declaration of Sentiments, largely patterned after the Declaration of Independence, declares that women, as well as men, are created equal:

We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

The continuing problem for American women, of course, was that they were governed without their consent. That is precisely how a majority of the country's leaders wished life to continue. As Frederick Douglass noted in the July 28, 1848 edition of his newspaper, The North Star:

A discussion of the rights of animals would be regarded with far more complacency by many of what are called the wise and the good of our land, than would be a discussion of the rights of woman. It is, in their estimation, to be guilty of evil thoughts, to think that woman is entitled to rights equal with man. Many who have at last made the discovery that negroes have some rights as well as other members of the human family, have yet to be convinced that woman is entitled to any.

Many newspapers contained scathing criticism of the Declaration of Sentiments. The following (some with misspelled words) are a few examples:

• The Oneida Whig (August 1, 1848): "Was there ever such a dreadful revolt? ... This bolt is the most shocking and unnatural incident ever recorded in the history of womanity. If our ladies will insist on voting and legislating, where, gentlemen, will be our dinners and our elbows? Where our domestic firesides and the holes in our stockings?"



• The Mechanic's Advocate, Female Department: "The women who attend these meetings, no doubt at the expense of their more appropriate duties, act as committees, write resolutions and addresses, hold much correspondence, make speeches, etc. etc. They affirm, as among their rights, that of unrestricted franchise, and assert that it is wrong to deprive them of the privilege to become legislators, lawyers, doctors, divines, etc. etc. ... Now it requires no argument to prove that this is all wrong."



• The National Reformer (August 31, 1848): Criticizing the Mechanic's Advocate article, the National Reformer notes: "O, shocking! Why, the world will be turned up-side down. The presumptious creatures 'hold much correspondence.' Laws should be passed by the 'lords of creation,' to prevent women, like other slaves, from learning to read, or they will soon prove themselves an over-match for their lords. . .Oh, oh! what will be done? If the 'lords of creation' cannot monopolize the 'learned professions,' then they are done for."



• The National Reformer (August 10, 1848): "There is a class of men (and many of them connected with the press) who stand ready to condemn, or what is worse, ridicule every movement of this character, simply because propositions are made to change certain usages with which they are familiar and which have long existed. They argue that if they were not right they would not have existed so long without an effort to change them."