Facebook
Twitter

General Horatio Gates and the Newburgh Conspiracy

General Horatio Gates American History Biographies History Social Studies Visual Arts

Gilbert Stuart, a Revolutionary-War-era artist, created this portrait of Continental Army General Horatio Gates.

The oil-on-canvas, which Stuart created between 1793-94, is now owned by the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.

Curators at the National Portrait Gallery provide this background information about the painting and its subject:

For Horatio Gates (1728–1806) Stuart created an idealized military likeness that endowed the Hero of Saratoga with elegance and monumentality. In a tour de force of compositional arrangement, Stuart stacked the general's hands to manifest at once his gentility—the well-groomed fingers and partially open right palm—and his virility—the fist that clutches his sword.

Gates reported that he enjoyed sitting for Stuart and bantering, "with glass after glass of the celebrated painter's plentiful Madeira."

Although he was a war hero, during the American Revolution, Gates was also something else (at one low point in his life). Something untoward, in the eyes of his commander-in-chief. Upset that Congress had not paid the troops, Gates was about to lead a mutiny after the war was over.

George Washington stopped him, but not in an overtly forceful way.

The story about the budding mutiny—referred to as the Newburgh Conspiracy—and how it ended, before it fully erupted, is powerful. One of the lesser-known events of Washington's life, it had one of the most-profound impacts on the newly formed country.

Sidney Hart, Historian Emeritus for America’s National Portrait Gallery, tells us what happened:

On a raw and windy day in March, American army officers met to plan a mutiny. This was not a Tom Clancy or Brad Thor thriller; it actually happened.

On March 15, 1783, an officers’ meeting was held in Newburgh, New York, as George Washington’s army awaited the completion of peace negotiations in Paris that would end the American Revolution and allow the soldiers to disband. The army had not been paid in months. Officers used blankets to hide their tattered uniforms; soldiers did not even have blankets; there was little food. The army, including its commander, believed that an ungrateful Congress had forgotten them.

Previous to the meeting of the army officers, an anonymous “Address” [reportedly written by Major John Armstrong, aide to General Horatio Gates] was circulated, demanding relief from Congress before the army would disband. Ominously alluding to Washington, it warned officers to “suspect the man who would advise moderation.” Even during the darkest days of the Revolution, Washington had deferred to Congress, never wavering on the principle of civilian authority over the military. He would not now.

The plot originated with politicians frustrated with the weak government under the Articles of Confederation and with several army officers, including General Horatio Gates, the “hero of Saratoga,” who sought to replace Washington as commander-in-chief.

Congressmen Alexander Hamilton and James Wilson, Gouverneur Morris, and Superintendent of Finance Robert Morris schemed to have the army mutiny, intimidating Congress into passing an import tax that would provide resources to pay the soldiers and supply the government with permanent revenue.

These men did not want a military coup, which they believed would result in civil war or chaos, but a stronger national government. Plotting with Gates, however, was a dangerous game, since he DID want a coup. Not unaware of the danger, the politicians depended on General Washington to keep the army “within the bounds of moderation.”

Tension was high as Gates opened the proceedings on the morning of March 15. Washington was not expected to attend but entered the meeting hall through a side door and asked for permission to speak; Gates could not refuse.

Instead of pleading for moderation, Washington attacked the Address as “subversive of all order and discipline.” He reminded the officers of his loyalty to them and declared that rebellion would lead to “the ruin” of both the army and government. He pledged himself to their cause.

Then, the unexpected happened. Attempting to read a letter from a congressman supporting the army, Washington became disoriented, and reached into his pocket for a pair of glasses. Excusing himself, he explained that not only had he grown grey in serving his country, but now found himself growing blind.

The officers were stunned. Their frustrations and anger dissolved before their commander’s admission of frailty. Some officers openly wept. Washington brought them back from the abyss.

The army received relief from Congress, but the politicians did not get their tax. Some may minimize an event that did not happen, but contemporaries realized its seriousness. A mutiny might have weakened the position of those seeking a stronger national government and would have delayed the formation of a national military establishment.

Thomas Jefferson later best expressed the significance of Washington’s role in the new and fragile republic: “that the moderation and virtue of a single character had probably prevented this revolution from being closed as most others have been by a subversion of that liberty it was intended to establish.”

How disastrous would it have been for America if Horatio Gates had succeeded in his desire to lead a mutiny? What would the future for the new country have been had Gates’ pride trumped Washington’s humility? For an answer to that question, we could use Washington’s observations about armies:

The army is a dangerous instrument to play with.

Because Washington’s actions thwarted Gates’ intentions, this really interesting part of American history remains just a story, without having producing a national calamity.

Click on the image for a better view.

0 Question or Comment?
click to read or comment
1 Questions 2 Ponder
click to read and respond
0 It's Awesome!
vote for your favorite

Author: Carole D. Bos, J.D. 5124stories and lessons created

Original Release: Oct 07, 2013

Updated Last Revision: Oct 23, 2017


Media Credits

Image online courtesy, Wikimedia Commons.  PD

 

To cite this story (For MLA citation guidance see easybib or OWL ):

"General Horatio Gates and the Newburgh Conspiracy" AwesomeStories.com. Oct 07, 2013. Oct 23, 2017.
       <https://www.awesomestories.com/asset/view/130159>.
Awesome Stories Silver or Gold Membership Required
Awesome Stories Silver or Gold Membership Required
Show tooltips